Skip to main content
· 4/19/1984

Hamilton Bank v. Rulnick

Citations

  • 475 A.2d 134
  • 327 Pa. Super. 133
  • 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4588

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • oral testimony was inadequate as a matter of law to modify prior contract
  • alleged violation of duties as “professional real estate agents”
  • \`profession of a real estate broker'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wickersham, Wieand, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.