Hamill v. Neikind

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• investigation superfluous where juror’s posttrial comment to defense attorney so innocuous as not to risk new trial
• misconduct must generate “prejudice . . . or at least the possibility of it”
• arbitration award is res judicata as to all matters in the submission
• “[i]n Aillon, [our Supreme Court] ruled that jurors were competent to testify to the occurrence of incidents during trial or during their deliberations which might have affected the result of the trial, but could not testify as to the impact of such incidents on their verdict”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).