· 1/2/1954
Hamill v. Maryland Cas. Co.
Citations
- 209 F.2d 338
- 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3634
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Motive is the reason which leads the mind to desire that result.” (quoting James Stewart & Co. v. Law, 233 S.W. 2d 558, 561 (Tex. 1950))
- “The intent to benefit the third person is generally said to be controlling, and it is to be gathered from a construction of the contract in the light of the surrounding circumstances.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huxman, Murrah, Pickett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.