· 2/9/1996
Hamill v. Level
Citations
- 917 S.W.2d 15
- 39 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 282
- 1996 Tex. LEXIS 6
- 1996 WL 51172
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- untimely discovery response did not justify presumption that Hamill’s claims are meritless
- trial court may not use death-penalty sanction to deny a litigant a decision on the merits of the case unless it finds the sanctioned party’s conduct justifies a presumption that its claims or defenses lack merit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.