Skip to main content
· 2/9/1996

Hamill v. Level

Citations

  • 917 S.W.2d 15
  • 39 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 282
  • 1996 Tex. LEXIS 6
  • 1996 WL 51172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • untimely discovery response did not justify presumption that Hamill’s claims are meritless
  • trial court may not use death-penalty sanction to deny a litigant a decision on the merits of the case unless it finds the sanctioned party’s conduct justifies a presumption that its claims or defenses lack merit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.