Skip to main content
· 1/4/1995

Hamideh v. K-MART CORPORATION

Citations

  • 648 So. 2d 824
  • 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 18
  • 1995 WL 1698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affírming “the defendant’s motion for summary judgment where a reasonable inference, creating a presumption of notice on the part of the defendant, could not be drawn from the facts reflected by the record.”
  • even though plaintiff described a “clear liquid” on the floor and on her shoe, the court affirmed summary judgment since an employee stocking shampoo “is insufficient, without more, to create an inference that ... the shampoo-like substance [was] on the floor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Goderich and Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.