Skip to main content
· 3/20/2007

Hames v. City of Miami

Citations

  • 479 F. Supp. 2d 1276
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25104
  • 2007 WL 926171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding under Florida law that a public employee has no property interest in pension benefits because the pension vests \subject to the conditions in the forfeiture statute\
  • holding under Florida law that a public employee has no property interest in pension benefits because the pension vests \subject to the conditions in the forfeiture statute\
  • “[A]n employee has no vested property interest in the pension; it is always subject to the statutory forfeiture limitations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.