Hames Ex Rel. Hames v. Philadelphia Housing Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remarking that the Washington court “did not adopt the language from Dodson that objective medical evidence is required to cross the serious injury threshold”
• stating that Washington v. Baxter, 553 Pa. 434, 719 A.2d 733 (1998) declined to adopt a standard “that objective medical evidence is required in order to cross the serious injury threshold” in a limited tort case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).