Skip to main content
· 6/19/1991

Hamer v. Iowa Civil Rights Commission

Citations

  • 472 N.W.2d 259
  • 1991 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 211
  • 61 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 571
  • 1991 WL 108326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that administrative judge incorrectly considered issue of mitigation of damages where defendant failed to first raise it
  • holding administrative agency not bound by technical rules of evidence
  • prior acts of discrimination are relevant to show the general atmosphere of defendant's workplace and \need not be actionable in themselves in order to be admissible\
  • “Credibility assessments are largely left to the fact finder, and we give deference to those findings.”
  • prima facie case for discrimination requires allegation that adverse employment action be “based on an impermissible consideration”
  • prior acts of discrimination are relevant to show the gen eral atmosphere of defendant’s workplace and “need not be actionable in themselves in order to be admissible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Larson, Schultz, Snell, Andreasen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.