Hamel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plain language of Rule 37 is controlling and unambiguous in stating that the petition must be filed in the appropriate circuit court within the time limits specified in the rule
• refusing to adopt the mailbox rule
• refusing to adopt the mailbox rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Oloth Insyxiengmay v. Richard Morgan
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-03-30· cited 164×
• Causey v. Cain
  Fifth Circuit· 2006-05-24· cited 64×
• Setala v. J.C. Penney Co.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-02-08· cited 34×
• Massaline v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-10-22· cited 33×
• Day v. Minor
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2015-06-04· cited 2×
• Clay v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2015-10-01· cited 2×
• Mills v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2019-01-31· cited 2×
• Insyxiengmay v. Morgan
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-03-29
• Jackson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-07-11

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Houston v. Lack
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-24· cited 6,563×
• Seaton v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-04-22· cited 27×
• Benton v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-07-01· cited 22×
• Key v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1988-11-14· cited 15×
• Daffron v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-07-15· cited 1×