Hamel v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the notice of default was not required to indicate whether the HOA 10 was asserting a superpriority lien right or identify the superpriority lien amount”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Utsey v. Coos County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-09-26· cited 42×
• Hamel v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-04-25· cited 21×
• Alexander v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-05-03· cited 9×
• Rivas v. Persson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-30· cited 8×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bedell v. Schiedler
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 68×
• Hamel v. Johnson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-04-06· cited 63×
• Weidner v. Armenakis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-05-20· cited 52×
• Merrill v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-07-22· cited 45×
• Peek v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-04-28· cited 39×
• Hamel v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-02-10· cited 11×