Skip to main content
· 11/18/1986

Hambury v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 350 S.E.2d 524
  • 3 Va. App. 435
  • 3 Va. Law Rep. 1173
  • 1986 Va. App. LEXIS 379

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the presence of paraphernalia [e.g., scales, baggie corners, or razor blades] used in the packaging process” is inconsistent with possession for personal use
  • “The quantity of marijuana found was relatively small, but when considered with other circumstances, is sufficient to establish an intent to distribute.”
  • fact that “[j]ust prior to the police entry,” defendant was seated in kitchen where marijuana was found, coupled with his admission that it belonged to him, proved constructive possession
  • method of packaging of drugs is important factor in determining whether distribution intended

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.