Hambleton v. Palmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “respondent, who raised an objection to the missing time or place information in his notice to appear for the first time in a motion to reopen [has] . . . forfeited his objection to this missing information”
• denying a timely motion to reopen because “Niz-Chavez does not represent a change in law” applicable to that motion
• concluding “the respond- ent, who raised an objection to the missing time or place infor- mation in his notice to appear for the first time in a motion to re- open waited too long to raise this issue and forfeited his objection to this missing information”
• objections to the omission of time and place of hearing from an NTA are forfeited if raised for the first time in motion to reopen
• interpreting the regulatory requirements for a notice to appear

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).