Hambleton v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion to admit evidence of uncharged conduct because, inter alia, that evidence “was no more inflammatory than the facts of the charged scheme”
• “We presume that juries follow limiting instructions . . . .” (internal quotation marks and alteration omitted)
• “[W]e presume that juries follow limiting instructions . . . .”
• “We presume that juries follow limiting instructions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).