· 2/1/1988
Haman v. City of Surrey
Citations
- 418 N.W.2d 605
- 1988 N.D. LEXIS 30
- 1988 WL 6347
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming City on “critical factual issue” of the extent of benefit after two-day bench trial and separately considering whether required statutory notice was provided
- affirming City on “critical factual issue” of the extent of benefit after two-day bench trial and separately considering whether required statutory notice was provided
- affirming City on “critical factual issue” of the extent of benefit after two-day bench trial and separately considering whether required statutory notice was provided
- affirming City on “critical factual issue” of the extent of benefit after two-day bench trial and separately considering whether required statutory notice was provided
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Erickstad, Vande Walle, Gierke, Meschke, Levine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.