Skip to main content
· 2/1/1988

Haman v. City of Surrey

Citations

  • 418 N.W.2d 605
  • 1988 N.D. LEXIS 30
  • 1988 WL 6347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming City on “critical factual issue” of the extent of benefit after two-day bench trial and separately considering whether required statutory notice was provided
  • affirming City on “critical factual issue” of the extent of benefit after two-day bench trial and separately considering whether required statutory notice was provided
  • affirming City on “critical factual issue” of the extent of benefit after two-day bench trial and separately considering whether required statutory notice was provided
  • affirming City on “critical factual issue” of the extent of benefit after two-day bench trial and separately considering whether required statutory notice was provided

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Erickstad, Vande Walle, Gierke, Meschke, Levine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.