Hamamy v. Bush

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the Second Circuit requires that [a] plaintiff demonstrate that she was ‘similarly situated in all material respects’ to the individuals with whom she seeks to compare herself” (citing Graham v. Long Island R.R., 230 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir. 2000)
• “The McDonnell Douglas analysis applies to both Title VII discrimination claims and claims under § 1981.”
• “A plaintiffs speculations, generalities, and gut feelings, however genuine, when they are not supported by specific facts, do not allow for an inference of discrimination to be drawn.”
• “A plaintiff's speculations, generalities, and gut feelings, however genuine, when they are not supported by specific facts, do not allow for an inference of discrimination to be drawn.”
• “A plaintiff’s speculations, generalities, and gut feelings, however, genuine, when they are not supported by specific facts, do not allow for an inference of discrimination to be drawn.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).