Hamacher v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “exclusive use” is an “all-or-nothing standard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Joel A. Sharon and Ann L. Sharon v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
  Ninth Circuit· 1979-01-18· cited 135×
• Baie v. Commissioner
  U.S. Tax Court· 1980-04-23· cited 65×
• George H. And Sarah Newi v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
  Second Circuit· 1970-10-21· cited 46×
• Ernest Drucker, Patricia Rogers, Philip Cherry and Ruth Cherry, Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
  Second Circuit· 1983-08-19· cited 43×
• Bodzin v. Commissioner
  U.S. Tax Court· 1973-09-04· cited 41×
• John W. And Regina R.Z. Green v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-05-31· cited 39×
• Stephen A. Bodzin and Tanya K. Bodzin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
  Fourth Circuit· 1975-01-20· cited 38×
• Drucker v. Commissioner
  U.S. Tax Court· 1982-09-30· cited 32×
• Green v. Commissioner
  U.S. Tax Court· 1982-03-17· cited 28×
• Frankel v. Commissioner
  U.S. Tax Court· 1984-02-28· cited 26×
• Soliman v. Commissioner
  U.S. Tax Court· 1990-01-18· cited 17×