Skip to main content
· 6/24/1983

Halvorson v. Voeller

Citations

  • 336 N.W.2d 118
  • 1983 N.D. LEXIS 364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adopting minority view that pre-injury conduct, such as not wearing motorcycle helmet, may be used to mitigate damages in amount that injury could have been avoided by such use
  • evidence of nonuse of a helmet has no relevance to the issue of liability for causing an accident; nonuse may, however, be relevant to the issue of damages
  • evidence of nonuse of a helmet has no relevance to the issue of liability for causing an accident; nonuse may, however, be relevant to the issue of damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vande Walle, Erickstad, Pederson, Sand, Paulson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.