Halvorson v. Halvorson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Assuming that the court erred in its valuation, it was de minimis and an insignificant error that does not justify reversal in a case involving a marital estate of over $600,000.”
• explaining a relatively insignificant error, standing alone, does not warrant reversal of a judgment
• “The court specifically found that Glenn’s transfer of the property resulted in dissipation of marital assets and constituted economic fault.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).