· 10/6/1986
Halvorsen v. Ferguson
Citations
- 735 P.2d 675
- 46 Wash. App. 708
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting a malpractice claim as a matter of law for an attorney’s failure to present or emphasize a certain theory of apportionment of community property in a dissolution case
- attorney not liable for errors in judgment or trial tactics where attorney's error involves uncertain, unsettled, or debatable proposition of law
- expert statements that they would have conducted litigation differently cannot as a matter of law support a legal negligence action
- attorney not liable for errors in judgment or trial tactics where attorney’s error involves uncertain, unsettled, or debatable proposition of law
- “In general, mere errors in judgment or in trial tactics do not subject an attorney to liability for legal malpractice. * * * This rule has found virtually universal acceptance when the error involves an uncertain, unsettled, or debatable proposition of law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Swanson, Grosse, Webster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.