Skip to main content
· 10/6/1986

Halvorsen v. Ferguson

Citations

  • 735 P.2d 675
  • 46 Wash. App. 708

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a malpractice claim as a matter of law for an attorney’s failure to present or emphasize a certain theory of apportionment of community property in a dissolution case
  • attorney not liable for errors in judgment or trial tactics where attorney's error involves uncertain, unsettled, or debatable proposition of law
  • expert statements that they would have conducted litigation differently cannot as a matter of law support a legal negligence action
  • attorney not liable for errors in judgment or trial tactics where attorney’s error involves uncertain, unsettled, or debatable proposition of law
  • “In general, mere errors in judgment or in trial tactics do not subject an attorney to liability for legal malpractice. * * * This rule has found virtually universal acceptance when the error involves an uncertain, unsettled, or debatable proposition of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Swanson, Grosse, Webster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.