Skip to main content
· 8/5/1998

Halvorsen v. Aramark Uniform Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 77 Cal. Rptr. 2d 383
  • 65 Cal. App. 4th 1383
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6205
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 8523
  • 14 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 393
  • 1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the manager’s privilege is an affirmative defense to the tort of intentional interference with contractual relationship
  • “Cotran, however applies only to cases in which an employee is under ‘an implied agreement not to be dismissed except for good cause.’ ” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nicholson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.