Skip to main content
· 8/19/1987

Halsey v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Mid-America, Inc.

Citations

  • 410 N.W.2d 250
  • 48 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1585
  • 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1129
  • 76 A.L.R. 4th 303
  • 1987 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1264
  • 44 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,321

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the ICRA protects those with “substantial physical impairment[s] affecting [their] ability to perform on the job”
  • noting the ICRA protects those with “substantial physical impairment^] affecting [their] ability to perform on the job”
  • following receipt of right-to-sue letter, plaintiffs disability discrimination action was “filed, docketed, and tried in equity in the district court.”
  • noting the ICRA protects those with “substantial physical impairment[s] affecting [their] ability to perform on the job”
  • “In considering the reasonableness of an employer’s accommodation of an employee’s disability, we must consider not only the disabled employee’s needs but also the economic realities faced by the employer.”
  • action tried in equity in district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.