Halprin v. California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statute of repose was not implicated because parties agreed to toll any applicable statute of limitations
• noting that civil RICO claims require proof of injury to a plaintiff, while criminal - 17 - RICO prosecutions do not require injury and instead punish the defendant's \participation in the pattern as a whole\
• “In securities fraud cases, the federal rule is that plaintiff's cause of action accrues on the date the sale is completed.”
• “At the time it rendered its decision, the district court was clearly correct to apply the statute of limitations from Illinois blue-sky law_”
• limitations period runs once there is a RICO violation and the plaintiff discovers the injury
• accrual of cause of action depends on existence of injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).