Halpern v. Lehman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• claimant’s refusal to relocate not for purely personal noncom-pelling reasons, but was necessitated by her domestic obligations and the cost pro-hibitiveness of suitable daycare
• conflict with domestic obligations based upon a transfer and the possibility of a shift change constituted “compelling” reasons for claimant to quit and satisfied the statutory requirement that voluntary termination be for “good cause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).