Skip to main content
· 6/29/2017

Halper v. State

Citations

  • 227 So. 3d 592
  • 2017 WL 2817375

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in child custody appeal, stating: “We are not unmindful of our rule that the paramount consideration is the welfare of the children. The court continues to be the protector of the children with power to act in the future for their protection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.