Halo Wireless, Inc. v. Alenco Communications, Inc. (In Re Halo Wireless, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “courts still find the reasoning” of cases interpreting former Section 362(b)(5) “persuasive and applicable under current law.”
• “‘Whether to permit a nonparty to submit a brief, as amicus curiae, is, with immaterial exceptions, a matter of judicial grace.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).