Skip to main content
· 12/10/2002

Halo v. New York City Loft Board

Citations

  • 300 A.D.2d 77
  • 751 N.Y.S.2d 185
  • 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statute is not unconstitutionally vague on its face and denying motion to dismiss charges on this ground
  • “While the term ‘surcharge’ is not precisely defined by the statute itself it retains its everyday, eommonsense meaning ....”
  • “While the term ‘surcharge’ is not precisely defined by the 8 statute itself it retains its everyday, commonsense meaning . . . .”
  • “While the term ‘surcharge’ is not precisely defined by the 5 statute itself it retains its everyday, commonsense meaning . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.