· 12/10/2002
Halo v. New York City Loft Board
Citations
- 300 A.D.2d 77
- 751 N.Y.S.2d 185
- 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12111
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that statute is not unconstitutionally vague on its face and denying motion to dismiss charges on this ground
- “While the term ‘surcharge’ is not precisely defined by the statute itself it retains its everyday, eommonsense meaning ....”
- “While the term ‘surcharge’ is not precisely defined by the 8 statute itself it retains its everyday, commonsense meaning . . . .”
- “While the term ‘surcharge’ is not precisely defined by the 5 statute itself it retains its everyday, commonsense meaning . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.