Halmos v. Ins. Co. of N. Am.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that entity was a “service provider” in analysis of its 1 “designated agent” to receive notifications of claimed infringement as required under 17 U.S.C. § 2 512(c)(2). (Dkt. No. 57-4 at 6-7.
• finding that defendant 6 broke down uploaded videos into smaller “chunks”
• stating that the state court’s findings that defendant was competent to 14 plead guilty and stand trial are presumed correct if they are fairly supported by the record, and no 15 formal evidentiary hearing is required for this presumption to be applied
• discussing how risk of infringement is 10 lessened when copies are inaccessible to public

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).