Skip to main content
· 3/24/2016

Hallmark-Phoenix 3, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

Citations

  • 820 F.3d 696
  • 2016 WL 1169068
  • 205 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3614
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 5554

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Nor, finally, does the law of the case doctrine require the district court to enforce its earlier injunction.”
  • \[W]e are obliged to construe the [Anti-Injunction] Act’s exceptions narrowly.\ (emphasis added)
  • “Under the law of the case doctrine, the findings of fact and conclusions of law by an appellate court are generally binding in all subsequent proceedings in the same case . . . on a later appeal.”
  • involving a consent judgment entered on a settle- ment agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, Jolly, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.