· 3/24/2016
Hallmark-Phoenix 3, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
Citations
- 820 F.3d 696
- 2016 WL 1169068
- 205 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3614
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 5554
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Nor, finally, does the law of the case doctrine require the district court to enforce its earlier injunction.”
- \[W]e are obliged to construe the [Anti-Injunction] Act’s exceptions narrowly.\ (emphasis added)
- “Under the law of the case doctrine, the findings of fact and conclusions of law by an appellate court are generally binding in all subsequent proceedings in the same case . . . on a later appeal.”
- involving a consent judgment entered on a settle- ment agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Higginbotham, Jolly, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.