Hallis v. Hallis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring by footnote to the purpose underlying some of the more mundane rules
• referring by footnote to the purpose underlying some of the more mundane rules
• “[W]e have every reason to expect the briefs filed by pro se appellate advocates to demonstrate a good faith attempt to comport with CR 76.12 [now RAP 32], our rule for preparing briefs.”
• “[W]e have every reason to expect the briefs filed by pro se appellate advocates to demonstrate a good faith attempt to comport with CR 76.12 [now RAP 32], our rule for preparing briefs.”
• “It is a dangerous precedent to permit appellate advocates to ignore procedural rules.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).