Halliburton Company v. KBR, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Fit Tech, and concluding that the procedure at issue was “‘arbitration in everything but name’ because it has the ‘common incidents of arbitration’”
• construing multiple agreements that were facets of the same transaction as one contract
• finding appeal of motion to compel arbitration not moot even though parties engaged in subsequent arbitration because Court’s action could affect the rights of parties in regards to a motion to vacate the arbitration award
• interpreting appealability under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 16 (FAA)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).