· 10/18/1985
Halliburton & Associates, Inc. v. Henderson, Few & Co.
Citations
- 774 F.2d 441
- 3 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 101
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23728
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- focusing the futility inquiry on whether the “complaint as amended is still subject to dismissal”
- finding amendment would be futile because claims were subject to arbitration agreement
- “The claims contained in the [amended] complaint are subject to the parties’ agreement to arbitrate[.] Accordingly, the amendment was futile, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave, compelling arbitration and staying its own proceedings.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Godbold, Kravitch, Hatchett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.