Skip to main content
· 10/18/1985

Halliburton & Associates, Inc. v. Henderson, Few & Co.

Citations

  • 774 F.2d 441
  • 3 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 101
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23728

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • focusing the futility inquiry on whether the “complaint as amended is still subject to dismissal”
  • finding amendment would be futile because claims were subject to arbitration agreement
  • “The claims contained in the [amended] complaint are subject to the parties’ agreement to arbitrate[.] Accordingly, the amendment was futile, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave, compelling arbitration and staying its own proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Godbold, Kravitch, Hatchett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.