Hallam v. Brennan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding discovery of standing rule of law does not constitute a fact for purposes of the newly-discovered fact exception
• holding discovery of standing rule of law does not constitute concrete fact for purposes of new-facts exception
• holding discovery of standing rule of law does not constitute a fact (Footnote Continued Next Page) - 10 - J-S26009-21 In Peterson, the Supreme Court held that PCRA counsel’s ineffectiveness may constitute a newly discovered fact for purposes of the Section 9545(b)(1
• defendant’s actual knowledge of obscure rule of law involving proper charge under corpus delicti not considered “facts” as contemplated by section 9454(b)(ii)
• defendant’s actual knowledge of obscure rule of law involving proper charge under corpus delicti not considered “facts” as contemplated by section 9454(b)(ii)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).