Skip to main content

Halladay v. Cluff

Citations

  • 685 P.2d 500
  • 1984 Utah LEXIS 839

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting no discretion to the trial court’s allocation of the burden of proof
  • “[T]he meaning and intent of this opinion should not be judged by the content of the dissent, because we do not acquiesce in the dissent’s interpretation of this opinion.”
  • adding objective uncertainty to boundary by acquiescence requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oaks, Howe, Hall, Stewart, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Halladay v. Cluff

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.