Halla Nursery, Inc. v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the audit interference doctrine is inconsistent with modified comparative negligence statute
• holding that the audit interference doctrine is inconsistent with modified comparative negligence statute
• defining fundamental error as one that would “destroy the substantial correctness of the charge as a whole, cause a miscarriage of justice or result in substantial prejudice on an issue vital in the litigation.”
• when decision on motion for new trial is based on an error of law, standard of review is de novo
• when decision on motion for new trial is based on an error of law, standard of review is de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).