Ninth Circuit· 1/16/1957
Hall v. Wright
Citations
- 240 F.2d 787
- 112 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 210
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In applying the clean hands maxim, the court is ‘concerned primarily with protecting its own integrity from improper action by a party.”
- “In applying the clean hands maxim, the court is ‘concerned primarily with protecting its own integrity from improper action by a party.”
- “Under the ‘clean hands’ doctrine, one who does not come into 16 equity with clean hands, and keep them clean, must be denied all relief, whatever may have 17 been the merits of his claim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hamley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-01-03· cited 106×
- Gaudiosi v. MellonThird Circuit· 1959-06-24· cited 92×
- Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc.S.D. California· 1958-10-23· cited 51×
- In the Matter of Penn Central Transportation Company, DebtorThird Circuit· 1980-09-03· cited 33×
- Moon v. Cabot Shops, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1959-09-21· cited 31×
- Bergman v. Aluminum Lock Shingle Corp. of AmericaNinth Circuit· 1957-12-13· cited 29×
- Bernard H. Stauffer v. Slenderella Systems of California, Inc., a CorporationNinth Circuit· 1957-11-15· cited 28×
- Aerotec Industries of Calif. v. Pacific Scientific CompanyNinth Circuit· 1967-08-31· cited 18×
- Oregon Saw Chain Corporation, a Corporation v. McCulloch Motors Corporation, a CorporationNinth Circuit· 1963-12-12· cited 17×
- Oriental Foods, Inc. v. Chun King Sales, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1957-05-16· cited 14×
- POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca Cola Co.C.D. California· 2016-02-19· cited 10×
- In re Medpoint Management, LLCD. Arizona· 2015-04-06· cited 9×
- Bergman v. Aluminum Lock Shingle Corporation Of AmericaNinth Circuit· 1958-02-14· cited 6×
- Urecal Corp. v. MastersN.D. Illinois· 1976-05-24· cited 5×
- Container Corporation of America, a Corporation v. M.C.S. CorporationNinth Circuit· 1957-12-05· cited 4×
- Producers Lumber & Supply Co. v. Olney Building Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1960-03-03· cited 4×
- Delco Chemicals, Inc. v. Cee-Bee Chemical Co.S.D. California· 1957-12-11· cited 4×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1959-08-28· cited 3×
- Matherson-Selig Co. v. Carl Gorr Color Card, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1967-06-29· cited 2×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1957-03-04· cited 1×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court· 1945-04-23· cited 1,028×
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court· 1944-05-15· cited 1,010×
- Fashion Originators' Guild of America, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court· 1941-03-31· cited 589×
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1940-12-09· cited 262×
- Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Third Circuit· 1948-07-06· cited 106×
- Pecheur Lozenge Co. v. National Candy Co.Supreme Court· 1942-03-30· cited 82×
- National Van Lines, a Corporation v. Alfred E. Dean, Trading Under the Firm Name of National Transfer & Storage Co.Ninth Circuit· 1956-11-27· cited 57×
- Mas v. Coca-Cola Co.Fourth Circuit· 1947-08-20· cited 45×
- Swalley v. Addressograph-Multigraph Corp.Supreme Court· 1949-01-17· cited 44×
- Frank Adam Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Eighth Circuit· 1945-01-11· cited 43×
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. William Whitman Co.Supreme Court· 1949-01-17· cited 27×
- United States Hoffman MacHinery Corp. v. Pantex Pressing MacH., Inc.Third Circuit· 1930-11-11· cited 12×
- Lane-Wells Co. v. M. O. Johnston Oil Field Service Corporation. M. O. Johnston Oil Field Service Corporation v. Lane-Wells CoNinth Circuit· 1950-04-24· cited 9×
- Fernandez v. PhillipsNinth Circuit· 1943-06-11· cited 8×
- Pevely Dairy Co. v. Borden Printing Co.Ninth Circuit· 1941-10-20· cited 7×
- United States Hoffman Machinery Corp. v. Pantex Pressing Machine, Inc.D. Delaware· 1929-11-06· cited 5×
- John Bean Mfg. Co. v. CreagmileNinth Circuit· 1941-10-31· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.