Hall v. World Omni Leasing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that summary 45 ECF 50 (Defs.’ Reply), at 10 n.1. judgment had properly been entered against plaintiffs who signed documents “completely aware that they were blank as to important terms”
• holding on summary judgment that where a party purposely signed a writing “with blanks left to be filled in by the other party, the person signing is bound by it” (internal marks omitted)
• “ ‘If a writing is signed with blanks left to be filled in by the other party, the person signing is bound by it.’ ”
• “‘If a writing is signed with blanks left to be filled in by the other party, the person signing is bound by it.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).