· 1/3/2018
HALL v. the STATE.
Citations
- 809 S.E.2d 475
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that the district court did not reach the merits when it when it concluded only that the career-offender defendant was ineligible for relief
- district court’s discretion to resentence allows consideration of a defendant’s criminal history as reflected in presentence report
- district court’s discretion to resentence allows consideration of a defendant’s criminal history as reflected in presentence report
- district court’s discretion to resentence allows consideration of a defendant’s criminal history as reflected in presentence report
- plenary resentencing at court’s discretion
- plenary resentencing at court’s discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bethel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.