Skip to main content
· 1/3/2018

HALL v. the STATE.

Citations

  • 809 S.E.2d 475

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the district court did not reach the merits when it when it concluded only that the career-offender defendant was ineligible for relief
  • district court’s discretion to resentence allows consideration of a defendant’s criminal history as reflected in presentence report
  • district court’s discretion to resentence allows consideration of a defendant’s criminal history as reflected in presentence report
  • district court’s discretion to resentence allows consideration of a defendant’s criminal history as reflected in presentence report
  • plenary resentencing at court’s discretion
  • plenary resentencing at court’s discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bethel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.