Skip to main content
· 5/15/1967

Hall v. Teal

Citations

  • 427 P.2d 662
  • 77 N.M. 780

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Supreme Court noting absurdity in argument that entire action must fail when only one of two plaintiffs is the real party in interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carmody, Compton, Hensley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.