Hall v. Stephens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “questions concerning an employee’s retirement plans do not alone constitute direct evidence of age discrimination”
• concluding that employee failed to show pretext when he received poor performance reviews and was discharged in an RIF
• recognizing that “questions concerning an employee’s retirement plans do not alone constitute direct evidence of age discrimination”
• noting that mere disagreement with a performance evaluation cannot suffice to show pretext
• determining that an employer presented a non-discriminatory reason for termination where - 17 - No. 23-5385, Hammond v. Sysco Corp. it provided evidence that it terminated the plaintiff as part of a reduction in force due to poor job performance
• finding no inference of discrimination where those retained were also members of the protected group

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).