Hall v. State Road Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that police report in defense counsel’s possession was not “newly discovered”
• it is “irrelevant” for the purpose of Section 1512 that a person “did not realize that he was helping to conceal a federal crime”
• first quoting 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), and then quoting Franklin v. 12 Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1236 (9th Cir. 1984)
• “If [defendant] revised [its guidelines on the types of advertising it accepts] merely as a ruse for 23 impermissible viewpoint discrimination, that would be found unconstitutional regardless of the type of forum created.”
• information in a police report in the defendant’s possession was not newly discovered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).