Skip to main content
· 3/31/1983

Hall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Citations

  • 661 P.2d 402
  • 8 Kan. App. 2d 475
  • 1983 Kan. App. LEXIS 144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[t]he extent of an insurer’s Subrogation right generally depends upon the language found in both the applicable statute and the controlling insurance policy”
  • “An amicus curiae brief cannot raise issues that were not presented before the trial court.”
  • whenever a statute is ambiguous, the court may look to legislative history for evidence of intent of legislature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foth, Spencer, Swinehart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.