Skip to main content

Hall v. State

Citations

  • 981 A.2d 1106
  • 2009 Del. LEXIS 529
  • 2009 WL 3282635

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[t]he strong odor ofPCP establishes probable cause to believe the vehicle occupied by [defendant] contained evidence of criminal activity. Thus, the warrantless search of the [vehicle] was proper.”
  • recognizing that “[t]he strong odor of PCP establishes probable cause to believe the vehicle occupied by [defendant] contained evidence of criminal activity. Thus, the warrantless search of the [vehicle] was proper.”
  • recognizing that “[t]he strong odor of PCP establishes probable cause to believe the vehicle occupied by [defendant] contained evidence of criminal activity. Thus, the warrantless search of the [vehicle] was proper.”
  • holding strong odor of PCP established probable cause to support warrantless search of the car
  • finding a seizure when a detective parked car behind suspect and blocked him in, then approached the car and gave an order
  • “The strong odor of PCP establishes probable cause to believe the vehicle occupied by Hall contained evidence of criminal activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele, Holland, Berger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.