Hall v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although an expert may not testify as to personal belief in the testimony of another witness, an expert may testify whether the expert’s observations are consistent with the disputed testimony
• although an expert may not testify as to personal belief in the testimony of another witness, an expert may testify whether the expert’s observations are consistent with the disputed testimony
• although an expert may not testify as to personal belief in the testimony of another witness, an expert may testify whether the expert’s observations are consistent with the disputed testimony
• “... judges and lawyers [must] be alert to the distinction between the expert opinion that assumes the truthfulness of disputed testimony, and the expert opinion that asserts that the testimony is true. The former is admissible. The latter is not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Miller
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-10-01· cited 69×
• Brooks v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-27· cited 35×
• MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. v. BP Solar International, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-03· cited 9×
• Horton v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-01-28· cited 3×
• Memc v. Bp
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-03