· 2/12/1992
Hall v. Sears Product Service
Citations
- 792 F. Supp. 1026
- 61 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,132
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Clearly, the jury cannot award more in back pay than [the plaintiff] proved to have lost.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.