Hall v. New York City Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “reprimands and excessive scrutiny do not constitute adverse employment actions in the absence of other negative results such as a decrease in pay or being placed on probation” (citation, alteration, and quotation marks omitted)
• “But, this doctrine ‘applies only to circumstances where an 6 actor is confronted by a sudden and unforeseen occurrence not of the actor’s own making.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).