Hall v. Nalco Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an adverse employment action based on childbearing capacity presents a cognizable claim of sex discrimination under Title VII
• “‘[a] complaint need not identify a legal theory, and specifying an incorrect theory is not fatal’ to a plaintiff’s claim”
• “‘[A] complaint need not identify a legal theory, and specifying an incorrect theory is not fatal’ to a plaintiff’s claim.” (quoting Bartholet v. Reishauer A.G. (Zurich), 953 F.2d 1073, 1078 (7th Cir. 1992))
• “‘[A] complaint need not identify a legal theory, and specifying an incorrect theory is not fatal’ to a plaintiff’s claim.” (quoting Bartholet v. Reishauer A.G. (Zurich), 953 F.2d 1073, 1078 (7th Cir. 1992))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).