Hall v. Montgomery County Fiscal Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Colorado River abstention inapplicable because the patients were unable to initiate any state administrative proceed ing to challenge their provider’s termination
• applying rule from rule from Marks v. United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977) to deem Justice Breyer’s concurrence controlling
• refusing to apply Armstrong “beyond the confines” of -15- Section 30(A) by extending its holding to prohibit actions to enforce other Medicaid provisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).