Hall v. McNeer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that no magic words are necessary to trigger the requirement that the trial court conduct a Richardson hearing
• stating that no magic words are necessary to trigger the requirement that the trial court conduct a Richardson hearing
• stating that “[0]nce put on notice of a [discovery] violation, the trial court has an affirmative obligation to conduct a hearing without the defendant specifically requesting one.”
• harmless error analysis is necessary where defense's violation of discovery rule results in exclusion of defense witness without adequate Richardson inquiry
• quoting. State, v. Schopp, 653 So.2d 1016, 1020 (Fla.1995)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).