Skip to main content
· 4/19/1993

Hall v. Madison

Citations

  • 428 S.E.2d 345
  • 263 Ga. 73
  • 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 1679
  • 1993 Ga. LEXIS 373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court in habeas proceeding may examine prosecutor’s voir dire notes in camera to determine whether disclosure is warranted
  • trial court in habeas proceeding may examine prosecutor's voir dire notes in camera to determine whether disclosure is warranted
  • civil litigant cannot use mandamus to enforce Open Records Act because discovery provides alternative remedy
  • A prosecutor was not required to disclose his voir dire notes following an ORA request, because “[a]ttorney work product falls within an exception to the Public Records Act. OCGA § 50-18-72 (e) (2).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.