· 4/19/1993
Hall v. Madison
Citations
- 428 S.E.2d 345
- 263 Ga. 73
- 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 1679
- 1993 Ga. LEXIS 373
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court in habeas proceeding may examine prosecutor’s voir dire notes in camera to determine whether disclosure is warranted
- trial court in habeas proceeding may examine prosecutor's voir dire notes in camera to determine whether disclosure is warranted
- civil litigant cannot use mandamus to enforce Open Records Act because discovery provides alternative remedy
- A prosecutor was not required to disclose his voir dire notes following an ORA request, because “[a]ttorney work product falls within an exception to the Public Records Act. OCGA § 50-18-72 (e) (2).”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.