Skip to main content
· 1/8/1916

Hall v. Kansas City Terra Cotta Co.

Citations

  • 97 Kan. 103
  • 154 P. 210
  • 1916 Kan. LEXIS 236

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Assignment — Proceeds of Contract — Valid as Against Garnishment. Where a defendant corporation assigned to a bank the proceeds of a contract due and to become due for furnishing materials and labor to a building contractor, such assignment is valid as against a garnishment of the funds in the hands of the building contractor.</p> <p>2. Same — Assignment Did Not Create Chattel Mortgage. Such an assignment is not a chattel mortgage requiring registration to be valid against the claim of another creditor proceeding by writ of garnishment.</p>

Judges: Dawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.